While reading Patricia Meyer
Spacks Annotated Pride and Prejudice,
I read a footnote in reference to the following statement from Elizabeth (in speaking to Jane): “I
can much more easily believe Mr. Bingley’s being imposed on, than that Mr.
Wickham should invent such a history of himself as he gave me last night;
names, facts, every thing mentioned without ceremony. If it be not so, let Mr. Darcy
contradict it. Besides there was truth in his looks.”
My take on that quote was that
Elizabeth believed Wickham’s tale because he was an accomplished liar and gave
nothing away by his facial expressions. But according to Spacks, there was more
to it than that:
“Interest in physiognomy, a
pseudo-science that purports to read character from facial expression, was
widespread in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries... Joseph Kaspar Lavater,
a Swiss clergyman, wrote an extensive treatise on the subject (1778).
Translated into English in 1793, it exercised considerable influence. Austen,
however, is skeptical. A propensity to judge people on the basis of their looks
turns up again in Emma, where Emma’s initial enthusiasm for Harriet Smith is
based mainly on the girl’s “soft blue eyes” and her “look of sweetness.” Both
Elizabeth and Jane have consistently cited Wickham’s looks as evidence of his
amiability and authenticity.”